Sports analytics · Starting with World Cup 2026

The numbers behind the game.

We compile the parts of the game that usually go unmentioned — head-to-head history, penalty-shootout records, strength-and-form models, goal-timing patterns, and the scheduling and altitude context behind results.

48 teams 104 matches 30+ data points per fixture
NED–JPN kicks off in
Match Intelligence SAMPLE
🇳🇱NED
vs
🇯🇵JPN
Strength model Elo-calibrated
39%
28%
33%
NED Draw JPN
H2H all-time (3)
2–1–0
Avg goals / meeting
2.67
Elo gap
17 pts
FIFA vs Elo · NED
#7→#9
FIFA vs Elo · JPN
#18→#11
Open-data sourcedThe Touchline
Head-to-head last 5 in majors Shootout record by tournament Elo rating opponent-adjusted Rank vs form reputation gap Match odds Elo-calibrated Goal timing late-goal share Fatigue flag 3rd game / 9 days Altitude swing Mexico City 2240m
What we track

Not the stats you can find in thirty seconds.

Anyone can pull possession and shots on target. We focus on the patterns that take real work to compile — and that actually carry signal.

01

Head-to-head history

Last ten meetings, last five in major tournaments, average goals per pairing and scoring trends — drawn from every international since 1872.

Last 10MajorsTrends
02

Penalties & shootouts

Penalty-shootout records broken down by tournament, the first-shooter advantage, and each side's share of goals scored from the spot.

ShootoutsFirst-shooterSpot-kicks
03

Strength, form & odds

Our own Elo ratings, opponent-adjusted form that strips out weak-schedule inflation, the gap between FIFA ranking and real form, and Elo-calibrated win/draw/win probabilities.

EloFormMatch odds
04

Goal patterns

When teams score and concede — opening fifteen, late-game, stoppage time — plus all-time top scorers and how reliant a side is on one man.

TimingLate goalsScorers
05

Schedule & fatigue

Third game in nine days, days of rest, travel distance and timezone shifts between host cities, and altitude swings like Mexico City's 2,240m.

FatigueTravelAltitude
06

Tournament pedigree

World Cup record and win rate, neutral-venue performance, current unbeaten runs, and how each nation's FIFA ranking has moved over time.

WC recordNeutral venueRanking
A sample read

What a match read actually looks like.

One fixture, four angles. This is the shape of every breakdown we post — the patterns laid out plainly, with the context that moved them. No verdict handed down; the read is yours to make.

🇳🇱
Netherlands vs JapanGROUP STAGE · 14 JUN 2026 · ARLINGTON, USA
🇯🇵
Read in full ↓
01 Strength & odds

Favourites on paper — barely

The Netherlands sit at 2014.6 on our Elo, Japan at 1997.8 — a gap of just 17 points. The model, calibrated on 49,000 historical matches, leans Netherlands 39%, draw 28%, Japan 33%. FIFA has them 7th and 18th; on Elo they're 9th and 11th.

Signal: the rankings say mismatch. The strength model says near coin-flip with a Dutch lean.
02 Head-to-head

Short history, one big-stage test

Three meetings, Netherlands ahead 2–1–0 at 2.67 goals per game. Japan have never beaten the Dutch — but their only major-tournament meeting, the 2010 World Cup group stage, was a 1–0 Dutch win decided by a single second-half goal.

Signal: the record favours the Dutch; the one match that mattered was a one-goal game.
03 Form & goals

Ranking flatters the Dutch

The Netherlands average 2.09 scored and 1.22 conceded per game; Japan 1.83 and 1.15 — the slightly tighter defensive unit. Once opponent strength is priced in, the eleven-place FIFA gap between these sides all but disappears.

Signal: the underlying numbers run far closer than the ranking. A genuine banana-skin opener.
04 Schedule & context

A neutral stage, a level field

AT&T Stadium in Arlington is enclosed and climate-controlled — no altitude, no heat exposure, and no travel asymmetry worth flagging. Both sides open their group here fresh, with no fatigue or extra-time hangover in the system.

Signal: no environmental edge either way. This one is settled on form and the pitch.
Every figure traceable to its source · refreshed before kickoff Get these before every match
0+
data points compiled per fixture
0K
international matches in our base, 1872–2026
0%
figures traceable to a public source
0
tips, locks, or guarantees sold
Approach

Plain numbers. No noise.

01

We show the work

Every figure traces back to a public dataset — international results since 1872, the FIFA ranking, club data, and our own ratings built on top. Where the data is thin, we say so.

02

Context over predictions

We publish patterns, history, and strength models — not tips or guarantees. The probabilities are context; the conclusions are yours.

03

Built to last past the cup

The World Cup is where we start. The same approach extends to other competitions and other sports over time.

Join the channel

Match reads, before every match.

We're posting breakdowns through the tournament on Telegram. Free to follow while we build it out.

Open Telegram

No spam. A read per fixture, and nothing in between.